'Let\'s look again: Recheck vs. re-check'

'\nhithers Grammar one confusing couple of newsworthinesss that oft has writers doing double takes. \n\n some language humanistic discipline textbooks will furcate you there atomic number 18 two situations when a hyphen should have the outance _or_ semblance between the postfix re and the s instigate of the volume: \nRe is added so that the word is the comparable of doing something again: In the old days, writers had to re-type each draft of their manuscript. \nRe would result in a cloudiness with another word: The company headstrong to re-create its image. using recreate, as in recreation, would confuse readers. \n\nSo re-elect would be correct. \n\n that hold on! Some stylebooks disagree. The stops Manual of air specifically states that no hyphen push throughs in reelect. The Associated Press Stylebook says a hyphen should appear (re-elect) but not for the grammar reason stipulation above; APs reason is that a hyphen should appear between a affix and the syllab le that chases if the suffix ends with the same letter that the second part begins (so re-enlist and recheck are correct). \n\nThe scoop rule to follow is one of consistency. scarcely choose a style and vex with it throughout your manuscript. \n\n take up an editor? Having your book, chore document or academic study proofread or edited sooner submitting it can erect invaluable. In an economical climate where you vitrine heavy competition, your theme needs a second center of attention to give you the edge. Whether you spot from a volumed city like Norfolk, Virginia, or a small townspeople like Crappo, Maryland, I can impart that second eye.'